Sabtu, 17 Oktober 2009

Never-Seen-Before Bess Truman Letters to Husband Harry Show a True Love Story

Obama: Health Industry Deceiving Consumers
President Says "Dishonest" Ads and Studies from Insurance Lobbyists Are Designed to Mislead
Never-Seen-Before Bess Truman Letters to Husband Harry Show a True Love Story
ABC News's Kristina Wong reports from Washington: Former first lady Bess Truman and President Harry Truman met in Sunday school when she was five and he was six. They would marry 29 years later and become one of American political...
Health-care fight: Obama vs. insurers

by Mark Silva

A full-bore fight is on to the finish:

With a frontal assault on the insurance industry for sponsoring "misleading'' information, President Barack Obama today calls the passage of health-insurance reform "the great test'' of the "change'' that Americans demanded in the election.

With Democratic congressional leaders now moving beyond the question of whether there will be a health-care overhaul this year, and on to the question of what it will look like, Obama is warning that critics will fight to "score political points'' and insurers will fight to "protect their profits'' with "smoke and mirror'' tactics.

The president today accuses the insurance industry of "paying for misleading studies'' -- one released this week warned that the price of premiums will rise with the bill that cleared the Senate Finance Committee by 14-9, with one Republican vote. Senate leaders denounced the work as "bogus.'' The industry, the president says, is "flooding'' Capitol Hill with lobbyists and the airwaves with misleading ads.

"Of course, like clockwork, we've seen folks on cable television who know better, waving these industry-funded studies in the air. We've seen industry insidersand their apologistsciting these studies as proof of claims that just aren't true,'' Obama says in his weekly radio and Internet address today.

"It's smoke and mirrors. It's bogus. And it's all too familiar,'' Obama says. "Every time we get close to passing reform, the insurance companies produce these phony studies as a prescription and say, "Take one of these, and call us in a decade." Well, not this time.''

"Let's get real,'' Rep. Kevin Brady, a seventh-term Republican from Texas and lead House Republican on the Joint Economic Committee, maintains in ihis party's weekly address today.

The insurance legislation, he maintains, is simply part of another plan by Democrats to spend more, tax more and drive the deficits higher -- though the Congressional Budget Office has scored the $829 billion Senate Finance plan as a deficit-cutter over 10 years. With the White House claiming this week that one million jobs have been created or saved by what's been spent so far of the $787-billion economic stimulus enacted in February, the Republicans point to more than 3 million jobs lost since then and reject the White House's argument that the insurance bill will help the economy.

"The truth is: no jobs. No recovery,'' Brady says in his party's address today. "Let's finally admit America's recovery can't be built on the unsteady Democratic doctrine of spending more, borrowing more and higher taxes. It's failing our families.

"The second myth, that government-run health care will make it more affordable?'' Brady adds. "Americans inherently know government interference drives costs up, not down. The massive health care plans being crafted behind closed doors in Washington as we speak will ultimately allow the government to decide what doctors we can see, what treatments the government thinks you deserve and what medicines you can receive.

"The Democrats' plans are loaded with new federal mandates and higher taxes on insurance plans, treatments and equipmentall of which will be passed down to patients.''

See the president's address above, the Republican address below and read the texts of both below the fold, here in the Swamp:



This is the test of President Barack Obama weekly address:

Over the better part of the past year, a great debate has taken place in Washington and across America, about how to reform our health care system to provide security for people with insurance, coverage for those without insurance, and lower costs for everyone. From the halls of Congress to the homes of ordinary Americans, this debate has helped us to forge consensus and find common ground. That's a good thing. That's what America is all about.

Now, as the debate draws to a close, we can point to a broad and growing coalition of doctors and nurses, workers and businesses, hospitals and even drug companiesfolks who represent different parties and perspectives, including leading Democrats and many leading Republicanswho recognize the urgency of action. Just this week, the Senate Finance Committee approved a reform proposal that has both Democratic and Republican support. For the first time ever, all five committees in Congress responsible for health reform have passed a version of legislation. As I speak to you today, we are closer to reforming the health care system than we have ever been in history.

But this is not the time to pat ourselves on the back. This is not the time to grow complacent. There are still significant details and disagreements to be worked out in the coming weeks. And there are still those who would try to kill reform at any cost. The history is clear: for decades rising health care costs have unleashed havoc on families, businesses, and the economy. And for decades, whenever we have tried to reform the system, the insurance companies have done everything in their considerable power to stop us.

We know that this inaction has carried a terrible toll. In the past decade, premiums have doubled. Over the past few years, total out of pocket costs for people with insurance rose by a third. And we know that if we do not reform the system, this will only be a preview of coming attractions. A new report for the Business Roundtablea non-partisan group that represents the CEOs of major companiesfound that without significant reform, health care costs for these employers and their employees will well more than double again over the next decade. The cost per person for health insurance will rise by almost $18,000. That's a huge amount of money. That's going to mean lower salaries and higher unemployment, lower profits and higher rolls of uninsured. It is no exaggeration to say, that unless we act, these costs will devastate the US economy.

This is the unsustainable path we're on, and it's the path the insurers want to keep us on. In fact, the insurance industry is rolling out the big guns and breaking open their massive war chestto marshal their forces for one last fight to save the status quo. They're filling the airwaves with deceptive and dishonest ads. They're flooding Capitol Hill with lobbyists and campaign contributions. And they're funding studies designed to mislead the American people.

Of course, like clockwork, we've seen folks on cable television who know better, waving these industry-funded studies in the air. We've seen industry insidersand their apologistsciting these studies as proof of claims that just aren't true. They'll claim that premiums will go up under reform; but they know that the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office found that reforms will lower premiums in a new insurance exchange while offering consumer protections that will limit out-of-pocket costs and prevent discrimination based on pre-existing conditions. They'll claim that you'll have to pay more out of pocket; but they know that this is based on a study that willfully ignores whole sections of the bill, including tax credits and cost savings that will greatly benefit middle class families. Even the authors of one of these studies have now admitted publicly that the insurance companies actually asked them to do an incomplete job.

It's smoke and mirrors. It's bogus. And it's all too familiar. Every time we get close to passing reform, the insurance companies produce these phony studies as a prescription and say, "Take one of these, and call us in a decade." Well, not this time. The fact is, the insurance industry is making this last-ditch effort to stop reform even as costs continue to rise and our health care dollars continue to be poured into their profits, bonuses, and administrative costs that do nothing to make us healthythat often actually go toward figuring out how to avoid covering people. And they're earning these profits and bonuses while enjoying a privileged exception from our anti-trust laws, a matter that Congress is rightfully reviewing.

Now, I welcome a good debate. I welcome the chance to defend our proposals and to test our ideas in the fires of this democracy. But what I will not abide are those who would bend the truthor break itto score political points and stop our progress as a country. And what we all must oppose are the same old cynical Washington games that have been played for decades even as our problems have grown and our challenges have mounted.

Last November, the American people went to the polls in historic numbers and demanded change. They wanted a change in our policies; but they also sought a change in our politics: a politics that too often has fallen prey to the lobbyists and the special interests; that has fostered division and sustained the status quo. Passing health insurance reform is a great test of this proposition. Yes, it will make a profound and positive difference in the lives of the American people. But it also now represents something more: whether or not we as a nation are capable of tackling our toughest challenges, if we can serve the national interest despite the unrelenting efforts of the special interests; if we can still do big things in America.

I believe we can. I believe we will. And I urge every member of Congress to stand against the power plays and political ploysand to stand up on behalf the American people who sent us to Washington to do their business.

Thank you.

This is the fotext of Rep. Brady's address:

"Hi, I'm Congressman Kevin Brady. I'm proud to represent southeast Texas in Congress, and serve as the lead House Republican on the Joint Economic Committee, which keeps tabs on America's economic health.

"There are three big myths hurtling around Washington these days: no jobs equals an economic recovery, government-run health care will make it more affordable, and deficits don't matter.

"The American publicto their creditisn't buying any of these.

"Start with the economy. We're all pleased to see the stock market go up, but middle class America knows hundreds of thousands of jobs are disappearing each month. Many of them may never reappear.

"As families in my communities and across the country watch the national unemployment rate close to topping double digits -- with few real signs of relief ahead -- they have one question for the White House: 'Mr. President, where are the jobs?'

"Last January, the White House promised us all that if Congress passed the massive trillion-dollar 'stimulus' bill, jobs would be created immediately and the unemployment rate would stay under eight percent.

"Since then, nearly 3 million more Americans have lost their private sector jobs. Over 2 million have simply quit looking for work because they are so discouraged and that's frightening. And over 9 million Americans are working part time because they can't find a full time job. And those who do worry if they'll be the next person standing in the unemployment line.

"The truth is: no jobs. No recovery. Let's finally admit America's recovery can't be built on the unsteady Democratic doctrine of spending more, borrowing more and higher taxes. It's failing our families.

"The second myth, that government-run health care will make it more affordable? Americans inherently know government interference drives costs up, not down. The massive health care plans being crafted behind closed doors in Washington as we speak will ultimately allow the government to decide what doctors we can see, what treatments the government thinks you deserve and what medicines you can receive.

"The Democrats' plans are loaded with new federal mandates and higher taxes on insurance plans, treatments and equipmentall of which will be passed down to patients. New taxes on professionals and small businesses will drive jobs out of our economy and push more families into a government-run plan. At a time when families and workers want more choices and more options, Democrats in Washington are bent on creating a one-size fits all plan that Americans just take or leave. By the way, these same Democratic members of Congress are making sure they and their families aren't included in the plan. That should tell you something.

"The third myth: deficits don't matter? Tell that to your kids and grandkids and see what they have to say thirty years down the road.

"Whether its wasteful stimulus spending, a cap and trade national energy tax that will put millions more out of work or the trillion dollar health care experiment Democrats in Washington are boring new holes to our economic ship at a time when employers throughout America need a life preserver to help them stay afloat.

"Liberal policies that will keep people out of work longer will only make the deficit worse. Americans know that deficits matter to our dollar, to our economy, to our future. The federal budget deficit tripled to a record 1-point-4 trillion this fiscal year. The government spent 199-billion dollars on interest on the debt in 2009 -- or almost 10 times the entire budget for NASA.

"Under the Obama Administration's budget, our country is set to rack up 6.7 trillion dollars in debt over the next decade -- almost equal to all the federal debt accumulated in our nation's history. Democrats in Washington continue to pursue costly policies that tax too much, spend too much and borrow too much all of which are discouraging small businesses from job creation and innovation while launching our national debt into the stratosphere.

"Make no mistake, our children and grandchildren will end up buried under a mountain of debt if we continue down this dangerous path of taxing, spending and borrowing.

"Let's set aside the myths. Let's get real.

"Real economic growth starts when the people who have taken the hardest hit in this recession -- our small businesses -- get back to creating jobs. It's what these businesses that employ more than half our nation's workforce do best. Republicans want to give them new tax relief tools and get out of their way.

"Republicans remain hopeful that this deep and painful recession will soon run its course, but Americans deserve better than a jobless recovery, which is no real recovery at all for American workers and their families. Americans deserve affordable health care. And they deserve a nation that can pay its debts and live within its means.

"That's what Republicans believe. That's what will create the jobs that will grow our economy and put our nation back on the path to long-term prosperity.

"This is Congressman Kevin Brady. Thank you for listening."




Parks Director Rejection Raises Race And Gender Issues

Ximena Hartsock was appointed as the acting director of Washington D.C.'s Department of Parks and Recreation by Mayor Adrian Fenty last spring. But when she was nominated to fill the position permanently, she was rejected amid questions about how her ethnicity and gender would affect how she did the job. Host Scott Simon speaks to Hartsock about the controversy.


Jumat, 16 Oktober 2009

White House vs. FOX News: Round four

Higher Fees for Workers with Health Risks?
Washington Post: Health Care Legislation Would Allow Employers to Raise Costs for Workers Who Fail Medical Tests
Need Some Gold? Head Over to Harrods Department Store
ABC's Kelly Belknap reports from London: The London department store Harrods is expecting a gold rush this season and is stocking its shelves accordingly. Harrods began selling pure gold bars and coins at its main Harrods store yesterday in an...
White House vs. FOX News: Round four

by Mark Silva

Bring it on, Rupert Murdoch suggests.

The News Corp. chairman today told his stockholders that all the White House criticism of his FOX News Channel's commentators is "tremendously'' boosting their ratings.

"There were some strong remarks coming out of the White House about one or two of the commentators on FOX News," Murdoch told the annual meeting of News Corp. shareholders. "And all I can tell you is that it's tremendously increased their ratings.''

Initially, the White House was challenging some of FOX's commentators, but then the White House communications director made a broader argument on a rival cable network, CNN, that FOX in general has become a subsidiary of the Republican Party.

The White House's Web-site had taken FOX's Glenn Beck to task for some of his comments about the Olympics, during the president's ultimately unsuccessful attempt to help secure the 2016 summer games for Chicago.

Then Communications Director Anita Dunn issued a broader complaint Sunday on CNN's Reliable Sources:

"The reality of it is that Fox often operates almost as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party.... They're widely viewed as a part of the Republican Partytake [the GOP's] talking points, put'em on the air, take [the GOP's] opposition research, put'em on the air. But let's not pretend that they're a news network the way CNN is.''

Which only provided new fodder for Beck, who dug up some video of Dunn telling high-schoolers that one of her most admired philosophers is Mao Zedong.

"She is the woman that the White House put in charge of monitoring this show, because we're smearing them, we're lying, we're making things upwe're 'the arm of the Republican Party,''' Beck complained. "I just opened up Mao's little book here... How about this one: "A revolution is not a dinner party... a revolution is an insurrection, an act of violence, in which one party overthrows another'.... Mao Zedong, the little red book, led to millions of deaths... and she is not the only one in the White House.''

The chairman of the company that owns the FOX broadcast and cable networks and the Wall Street Journal reiterated an upbeat company forecast for the fiscal year ending in June 2010. In August, News Corp. said adjusted operating profit will increase by a high-single-digit percentage -- up from $3.44 billion last year.

Murdoch also made it clear that he will be charging more of his newspapers' readers money for what they read online. "We intend to charge for our content on the Web," Murdoch said. "As I've said many times in the past good journalism comes at a price...In the future successful newspapers will charge for their content and aggregators will largely be excluded.''

The chairman also had some words for the Obama administration.

"We're worried about the business climate and whether it will discourage the formation of new companies," he said. "There is a public perception, certainly, that this government is anti-business. I'm not saying it's a correct perception, but there is a perception and I think this perception is hurting the economy.


Future Unlikely For Kyoto Climate Treaty

Despite dissent from developing countries, the U.S. and Europe seem to be abandoning the idea of extending or revising the Kyoto climate treaty when it expires in 2012. Instead they will form a new treaty, but some doubt it will be ready in December, when diplomats meet in Copenhagen.


Kamis, 15 Oktober 2009

Obama Seeks To Ease Pain For Seniors — And Himself

First Hard Data on Stimulus Released
More than 30,000 Jobs Were Created or Saved at Businesses that Received Federal Contracts, White House Reports
Who's the Chicest Woman in Paris? Not Carla Bruni...
ABC's Christophe Schpoliansky reports from Paris: Who is the chicest lady in Paris? Well it’s not France’s first lady Carla Bruni! The former supermodel and now wife of French President Nicolas Sarkozy came fifth in an online poll conducted to...
Lou Dobbs targeted, in ad... not on CNN

by Mark Silva and updated at 3:35 pm EDT

If CNN's Lou Dobbs drops the word "amnesty'' into most discussions of immigration, some of his critics say they aren't forgiving Dobbs.

An ad calling on CNN to drop Dobbs has been prepared by a group challengng the cable newsman's practices. The group claimed today that the ad will air on CNN, but the cable network says the group has its story wrong.

"Contrary to reports, CNN has not accepted these spots and they will not air on the network,'' a spokeswoman said this afternoon.

The cable news announcer's complaints about "broken borders'' have become a broken-record"60 minutes of anti-immigrant hate'' -- according to the group whose prepared ad solicits signatures on a petition to drop Dobbs.

Media Matters said it has partnered with America's Voice, with the help of "thousands of grassroots activists'' who responded to fundraising for the anti-Dobbs ad campaign, to produce an ad it planned to run Oct. 21 and 22 during the cable network's heavily promoted Latino in America series.

This was only the latest move by a group that has mounted a full-scale campaign against CNN's self-styled "advocacy journalist.'' But the ad will not go on, CNN says.

CNN, for its part, calls Dobbs "tough, relentless and independent.'' The anchor and managing editor of Lou Dobbs Tonight, CNN says, "has won nearly every major award for television journalism'' -- including an Emmy for Lifetime Achievement in 2005, a National Television Academy award in '04 and the George Foster Peabody Award for his coverage of the 1987 stock market crash.

Media Matters has complained about Dobbs' "history of anti-immigrant rhetoric'' and conflicts of interest, such as agreeing to speak at a fundraising rally for the anti-amnesty Federation for American Immigration Reform.

The "Drop Dobbs" campaign has drawn support from the National Council of La Raza, the National Hispanic Media Coalition, the New Democrat Network and the Southern Poverty Law Center. See their prepared ad above, and their case below:



Obama Seeks To Ease Pain For Seniors — And Himself

Social Security recipients won't be getting a cost-of-living increase next year, but the White House has backed a plan to give them a one-time payment of $250, calling it an extension of the stimulus program. Some suggest a plan to give seniors $250 is as much an investment in politics as in the economy.


Rabu, 14 Oktober 2009

Bruised New Orleans Takes Stock of Obama

Bruised New Orleans Takes Stock of Obama
President to Visit Katrina-Battered City Thursday; Seen as Improvement over Bush, Though Reviews are Mixed
French Vogue Blackface Photos Cause Racism Uproar
ABC's Kelly Belknap reports from London: This month’s edition of French Vogue has stepped into even edgier territory and sparked international outrage. The fashion bible is accused of racism after using pictures of a white model ‘blacked up’ for the...
Michael Steele: 'Rodney King moment'

by Mark Silva

That one Republican vote on the health-care bill that cleared the Senate Finance Committee this week is nothing for Democrats to write home about, the GOP chairman says.

"One Republican vote out of 40 in the Senate does not bi-partisan make,'' Chairman Michael Steele said today, in an appearance on FOX News Channel's Happening Now. "You've got a long way to go, Mr. President, before you get to bi-partisanship in terms of really putting together a bill that makes sense."

Steele on FOX.jpg

Speaking of the 14-9 vote Tuesday in which Maine Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe joined all the Democrats on the committee, Steele said: "I think what we've seen here is a vote yesterday for higher taxes, more government spending, higher premiums and more government control. I just don't think that's where the American people are....

"Can we all get in a room and have a Rodney King moment and work toward something that reflects the common sense, bottom up approach that the voters and the insurance of our country want to be done?''

A "Rodney King moment?"

How about a Rahm Emanuel moment?

White House Chief of Staff "Rahm Emanuel is coming up to meet with the Senate leadership to talk about cramming through a bill out of those twoare Republicans invited to that meeting?" Steele asked. "At what point do we really start engaging in bi-partisan conversation about what is real health care reform?"

Perhaps when Republicans advance some "real health-care reform?" -- the Democratic response, we expect.

Consider this a Swamp moment.


Geithner 'Ultimately Responsible' For AIG Missteps

Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the $700 billion financial rescue program, appeared on Capitol Hill to answer questions about a new report outlining the official mistakes that led to massive bonus payments for executives at the bailed-out insurer.


Selasa, 13 Oktober 2009

Is Running a Marathon Good for You?

Pentagon: Year's Recruits Best Since 1973
Economic Downturn Helped Military Meet Recruiting Goals, Defense Dept. Says
Is Running a Marathon Good for You?
ABC's Bradley Blackburn reports from New York: Nearly 45,000 people laced up their running shoes and ran the Chicago Marathon on Sunday, completing a 26-mile race takes real dedication, particularly on windy Chicago day with sub-freezing temperatures. A few of...
Health-care advances, GOP vote gained

by James Oliphant

Legislation that would transform the nation's healthcare system cleared a significant hurdle today, as the Senate Finance Committee voted 14-9 for a sweeping overhaul.

Just one Republican, Sen. Olympia J. Snowe of Maine, voted for the bill. But that represented a victory for the White House, which had heavily courted Snowe, and it allowed overhaul advocates to claim that there was a vestige of GOP support for the measure.

"Is this bill all that I would want? Far from it," Snowe said in announcing her vote. "But when history calls, history calls."

The bill would require Americans to have health insurance, provide federal subsidies to help low-income workers buy insurance, establish new insurance marketplaces, regulate health insurer practices, and expand Medicaid. The plan as drafted is estimated to cost $829 billion over the next 10 years.

Some cast the vote in landmark terms.

"This is our opportunity to make history," said Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.). "Now is the time to get this done."

The long-anticipated committee vote sets the legislation up for debate on the Senate floor. But first its terms must be reconciled with those of a bill passed by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee this summer.

"I never count chickens before they are hatched, but this is obviously another step forward,'' President Barack Obama said after Snowe announced her support and the Senate Finance Committee was nearing its vote today.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), will work behind the scenes with help from the White House to craft a compromise in the coming days. Because the Finance bill explicitly sets forth how the bill would pay for the cost of covering uninsured Americans as well as set penalties for the failure to have insurance, its terms are expected to comprise the bulk of the bill that ultimately is debated on the floor.

Floor debate could begin before the end of the month.

Despite the committee' s approval, key provisions of the legislation remain to be resolved, including whether the bill ultimately will include some form of a government-run health insurer, the so-called "public option." Some senators favor a provision that would allow states to exempt themselves from providing a government option to consumers--a bid to sway moderates who otherwise might oppose a mandatory plan.

It's unclear whether Reid will include any sort of a public option in the bill during the merger process or instead invite an amendment during the Senate floor debate.

Also, there remains some significant disagreement about whether to pay for the expansion of healthcare coverage to millions of uninsured Americans with an excise tax on high-end insurance plans--as well as the threshold at which that tax would take effect.

Furthermore, the insurance industry has objected strenuously to the Finance Committee's loosening of the requirement in the bill that all Americans to purchase health insurance. The committee approved an amendment that weakened the penalties for failing to buy a plan.

Still, the Finance Committee's endorsement was undeniably a signature moment in a healthcare debate that has consumed Capitol Hill for much of the year. The vote was the culmination of months of work by Baucus and members of the committee. Prior to the vote, the committee met for eight contentious days and considered 135 amendments to the bill.

Up until the vote, the support of some Democrats such as Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) remained in doubt. All eyes, however, were on Snowe, whose imprimatur was deemed critical for Baucus and the White House to claim that there was some vestige of bipartisan support for the effort and to help create a 60-vote supermajority in the Senate to ward off a potential Republican filibuster.

The Maine moderate remained cagey about her vote until today's meeting, as many believed she would withhold her approval to ensure she would maintain a role as the final bill is written. In remarks prior to the vote, she made clear that her support going forward hinges on maintaining the bill's $829 billion price tag.

"My vote today is my vote today," Snowe said. "It doesn't forecast what my vote will be tomorrow."

Congressional Democrats have strived to keep the cost of the bill beneath $900 billion. The Finance bill does that, and the Congressional Budget Office has estimated it would shave the federal deficit by $81 billion over the next decade, as well.

Before a packed committee room this morning, senators on the committee alternately praised and criticized the bill prior to the vote, with Republicans arguing that the bill would result in higher premiums for Americans and higher taxes for businesses.

Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa.), the senior Republican on the committee, complained that Democratic leaders in the Senate scuttled a series of bipartisan talks between the so-called Gang of Six that occurred over the summer. He charged the bill had "moved leftward" as a result.

"Today, we see the fears that we had were legitimate and justified," Grassley said. "I still hold out hope the doorway to bi-partisanship will be opened once again."

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), too, slammed the process, saying that the ultimate bill would be written by Reid without GOP input. "It almost seems like hundreds of hours of debate were all for naught," Hatch said. "The real bill is currently being written behind closed doors."

Many Democrats addressed a report released Monday by an insurance industry trade group, that claimed that the bill would cause premiums for many Americans to skyrocket. Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) attempted to debunk the report and suggested that the report would fuel momentum for a public option as a means to make the insurance market more competitive. "It's a powerful argument, frankly, of why we should have a public plan," Kerry said.

As it stands, the bill would result in 94 percent of Americans having insurance, Baucus said, with 23 million taking advantage of new insurance exchanges that would be created by the bill and 14 million added to Medicaid rolls. The bill would subsidize the cost of insurance for Americans who earn incomes just above the federal poverty level. It would also prohibit insurance companies from denying or rating coverage based on preexisting medical conditions.

Some Democrats have expressed reservations about the bill, even as they voted for it. Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), a moderate up for reelection next year, said her support for the bill today did not mean she would vote for it on the Senate floor. She said her constituents remained concerned about the legislation.

"Americans out there are frightened," Lincoln said. "They're alarmed about big bills that are difficult to understand."

Wyden continued to insist the bill did too little to ensure that middle-class Americans would be able to afford health insurance. He predicted that in its current form, many working families would choose to be exempted from the mandatory insurance requirement because they will not be able to afford a suitable plan.

"People want coverage. People want coverage to be affordable," Wyden said. "We've got a lot more work to do with respect to affordability."


In New Orleans, Uneven Recovery Awaits Obama

President Obama will visit New Orleans Thursday to review recovery efforts more than four years after Hurricane Katrina. Residents say much of the city remains in survival mode. But by most accounts, the pace of recovery has improved under the Obama administration.


Senin, 12 Oktober 2009

Rush Limbaugh: Obama's TelePrompTer

Video: Ex-U.N. Envoy on Afghan Fraud
Former U.N. Deputy Envoy to Afghanistan Peter Galbraith spoke to Katie Couric about being fired after claiming the U.N. downplayed reports of fraud in Afghanistan's presidential election.
Zero Tolerance = Zero Sense?
ABC's Stu Schutzman from New York: Every so often, a story surfaces which presses our collective “outrage” button. Such a story turned up on the front page of today’s New York Times entitled “It’s A Fork, It’s A Spoon, It’s...
Rush Limbaugh: Obama's TelePrompTer

by Mark Silva

Radio's Rush Limbaugh, who famously has wished that President Barack Obama will fail -- his agenda, of course -- is hard-pressed to say what he likes about the president.

In a rare interview, Limbaugh was asked by NBC News' Jamie Gangel what President Barack Obama has done which meets the radio commentator's approval.

Limbaugh rubs his chin for some time, comes up short.

Is there anythng good about the president?

Obama has a good voice, says Limbaugh, he of the Golden Microphone, The president reads from a TelePrompTer very well, Limbaugh adds -- all for intended effect, of course.

Limbaugh really is a nice guy off-mic, the interviewer suggests. Old-fashioned even, in his politeness. On-air, it's another story. On-air, Limbaugh admits, he loves yanking chains -- and he enjoys the two days of press he gets out of his most outrageous lines.

The showman carries on..


U.S. Apology To Native Americans: Unnecessary Or Not Enough?

The U.S. Senate last week issued a resolution last week that calls on President Obama to formally apologize for historic violence and injustices inflicted upon Native Americans by the federal government. Some think such an apology is unnecessary, while others say it's not enough. Rob Capriccioso, Washington Staff reporter for the newspaper Indian Country Today, is joined by Sen. John McCoy, a state representative from Washington, to discuss the measure and whether it has the ability to reconcile.


Minggu, 11 Oktober 2009

Nobel bump?: Obama's approval rises

Video: Nobel Prize In A New Light
President Obama's surprise win for a Nobel Peace Prize has his critics fuming and, as Bob Schieffer notes, the Nobel Committee has only managed to change the way we look on the honor.
Nobel bump?: Obama's approval rises

by Mark Silva

Something funny has happened on the way home from Copenhagen, where President Barack Obama lost his bid for the Chicago Olympics:

His public approval has risen.

Something else came out of Osso in the meantime: A Nobel Prize for Peace.

We're hard-pressed for any other explanation for today's measurement of the president's job approval in the Gallup Poll's daily trackng surveys: 56 pecent.

Up 2 percentage points in a day.

Just last week, the president's approval rating had fallen to 50 percent in the Gallup track, as measured in the average of surveys from Oct. 3-5. That marked a second slump to the lowest point of his presidency in the Gallup track -- Obama had seen 50 a month before. That also followed the International Olympic Committee's rejection of Chicago's bid for the 2016 Olympic Summer Games on Oct. 2.

But later n the week, and with two days of polling in since the Nobel Committee announced Obama's Peace Prize at dawn Eastern Daylight Time on Friday, Obama's approval rose again.

Today, it's 56 percent -- still some 13 points shy of the peak that Obama reached, 69 percent, in the days following his inauguration. But still well above water.

If anyone has another explanation for the turnaround in the last few days, we're glad to hear it, here in the Swamp.


Nobel Doesn't Relieve Pressures Over Don't Ask Don't Tell

President Obama was the keynote speaker Saturday night at the annual dinner of the Human Rights Campaign, one of the country's best known gay rights organizations. The president embraced the goals of the group, but admitted he had yet to tackle the toughest items on its agenda. The president was introduced at the event as the newest winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, an honor announced just the day before and a subject of raging controversy ever since. Host Liane Hansen talks to NPR's Ron Elving about the political implications of President Obama's Nobel Peace Prize award and what's coming up on Capitol Hill.