Senin, 07 Desember 2009

Obama: 47 pct approval, new Gallup low

EPA: Greenhouse Gases Endanger Public
Agency Announces Gases Must be Regulated Because They Pose Threat to Public Health
Obama: 47 pct approval, new Gallup low

by Mark Silva

President Barack Obama's job approval in the Gallup Poll's daily tracking survey today -- 47 percent -- marks a new low for the president's job ratings.

Obama's approval has fallen below 50 percent in recent Gallup tracking, and had reached a low of 48 percentage points before today's report, the average of surveys taken over the past three days.

"Any slight bump in support Obama received coincident with his new Afghanistan policy proved to be very short-lived, as his approval rating returned to below the majority level by the weekend, and slipped further to 47 percent in Dec. 4-6 polling,'' Gallup's Jeffrey Jones reports.

"Afghanistan is just one of many high-profile issues with which the president is dealing, Jones notes. "Immediate public reaction to his new Afghanistan policy showed 51 [percemt in favor and 40 perccent opposed, according to a Dec. 2 USA Today/Gallup poll....

" Additionally, in recent days Obama has been ramping up his focus on finding ways to create jobs for out-of-work Americans, and is planning a major speech on Tuesday outlining his ideas for spurring job creation. In late November, Gallup found slight majorities of Americans disapproving of the way Obama was handling job creation and the economy more generally.''

So far in December, Obama has averaged 50 percent job approval in the Gallup tracking, which found his approval rating at 69 percent days after inauguration.

Gallup reports: "That is similar to the December averages for Ronald Reagan (49 percent) and Bill Clinton (53 percent), who also took office when the economy was struggling."


Obama To Deliver Speech On Economy

Sandwiched between his speech on the Afghanistan troop build-up last week and two international speeches later this week, President Obama will deliver an economic policy address Tuesday. Patience with the pace of government action is running short on Capitol Hill, and many Democrats fear the public is starting to question whether Obama feels their pain.


Minggu, 06 Desember 2009

Video: Protesting N.Y. Terror Trials
Hundreds rallied in NYC to protest the government's plans to hold major terrorism trials in a Manhattan federal courthouse. As Randall Pinkston reports, the courthouse is just blocks from ground zero.
Durbin questions Afghanistan strategy

by Mark Silva

Count Sen. Dick Durbin among those doubtful about the new deployment of troops in Afghanistan that President Barack Obama has ordered.

"I'm skeptical as to whether 30,000 more troops will make a difference,'' Durbin, the senior senator from Illinois, No. 2 Democratic leader in the Senate and mentor and friend to Obama, said on FOX News Sunday. " We have over 200,000 now when you count NATO forces, American forces and Afghan military forces."

The U.S. military presence will grow to 98,000 by next summer, under the surge that Obama has ordered for Afghanistan, followed by a planned withdrawal of troops starting in July 2011, with the pace and endpoint of that draw down to be determined by "conditions on the ground,'' under the "new way forward'' that the president announced in a nationally televised speech last week.

"I understand the president took the time to reach this decision after more than seven years'' of U.S. involvement in Afghanistan,'' Durbin allowed. "We were at a point where we had to really reassess our strategy.''

Among the questions remaining: that announced intention for withdrawal starting in 2011 which the White House acknowledged would likely be "misinterpreted'' even as the president was announcing his plans.

"I'm going to meet with the president, I'm sure, and have conversations about that deadline which appears to be interpreted different ways by different people,'' Durbin said. "But I would like to believe by July of 2011 that we will be in a... a position... where we're going to see our troops really coming home."

Durbin said: "The pace of our troops coming home, I understand, depends on conditions...Are we going to let American soldiers stay there indefinitely while they dither, in Vice President Cheney's words? I don't think we should. American lives are at stake. And so I want to know, at least from my point of view, what the president's meaning is when he talks about this deadline."


Obama Rallies Democrats On Health Overhaul

President Obama appealed directly to senators' desire for history-making change and their short-term political fears Sunday in urging them to stand together and overhaul the nation's health care system.


Sabtu, 05 Desember 2009

'Climategate:' What a joke

Senate Holds Weekend Debate on Health Bill
Lawmakers Bicker Over Reform Package; Obama to Attend Democratic Caucus Meeting Sunday
'Climategate:' What a joke

by Mark Silva

"Climategate,'' they call it.

What a joke.

As if the hacking of some email in England exposing some overzealous scientists with a political agenda undermines the world's collection of scientific data on climate change.

Suddenly, it's time for Al Gore to surrender his Nobel Prize.

"Poor Al Gore, global warming completely debunkedvia the very Internet you invented,'' chimes Jon Stewart, host of The Daily Show. "Oh, the irony.''

Just like snow in Houston:

Proof, the Luddites insist, that global warming is nothing more than a modern interlude between the great Ice Ages and the human spewing of megatonnage of carbon into the atmosphere has nothing to do with it. All that shrinking Arctic ice cap stuff? Mere Photo-shopping.

The closing argument against climate change, critics contend, comes with more than 1,000 emails hacked in England involving climate research since 1996 that includes talk of combating the arguments of climate-change skeptics, harsh words for those skeptics, exclusion of scientists with contrarian views on the matter and destruction of data that might undermine evidence of global warming.

As if this is the only work in the world that has gone into the investigation of global warming and man's hand in it.

The United Nations has relied on the work of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in Great Britain for its "alarmist'' action on climate change, FOX News Channel's Brit Hume notes. The believers in climate change and man's hand in it say the hacked emails from the CRU are being "taken out of context,'' Hume reports.

"There's a one-word answer to all of that: Please.''

As a U.N. conference on climate change in Copenhagen assembles next week, with President Barack Obama and other world leaders headed there for the conclusion of the conference on Dec. 18and Obama making his own journey to Oslo on Dec. 10 to pick up a Nobel Prize for Peacepurveyors of the 'Climategate scandal' would have it that some hacked email is cause for calling off the whole thing.

"The momentum for that was already declining, because global warming, climate change, has been dropping lower and lower in peoples' lists of priorities for a long time now,'' Hume has concluded "and doubts about whether man is causing it and the whole theory of it have been rising. This can only further that that.... Perhaps it may all even be a fraud.''

One word, indeed:

Please.


Years After Death, Obama's Mom Gets Her Wish

A few years before her death, Barack Obama's mother completed her doctoral dissertation. Nearly two decades later, S. Ann Dunham's fieldwork has been published — a fulfillment of her dream, courtesy of her daughter.


Jumat, 04 Desember 2009

Sarah Palin Fans Push for Presidential Run
Thousands Show up for Sarah Palin Book Signings, Hoping the Former Gov. Will be a Presidential Candidate in 2012
Sarah Palin: Birther? Not me, but 'issue'

by Mark Silva

Sarah Palin says she is no birther.

The author of Going Rogue insists that she has never suggested that President Barack Obama, a native of Hawaii, was not born in the United States.

Yet, in a radio interview this week, the Republican candidate for vice president last year suggested that the veracity of Obama's birth certificate is a worthy question. (She also spoke of "the snake-oil'' science behind climate-change theories -- ''the fact is, the Caribou population is increasing,'' Palin noted.)

Paln made an appearance Thursday on Rusty Humphries' radio showsee the full talk above. Humphries asked his guest, seen by some as a potential candidate for president in 2012, this question:

"Would make the birth certificate an issue if you ran?''

"Um, I think the public, rightfully, is still making it an issue,'' Palin replied. "I don't have a problem with that. Um, I don't know if I would have to bother to make it an issue, because I think enough members of the electorate still want answers.''

"Do you think it's a fair question to be looking at?'' the host asked.

"I think it's a fair question, just like I think past associations and past voting records, all of that is fair game,'' Palin told Humphries.

"You know, I gotta tell you, too, I think our campaign, the McCain-Palin campaign, didn't do a good enough job in that area. We didn't call out Obama and some of his associates on their records and what their beliefs were, and perhaps what their future plans were, and I don't think that that was fair to voters, to not have done our jobs as candidates and as a campaign to bring to light a lot of things that now we're seeing made manifest in the administration.''

Humphries added: "I mean, truly, if your past is fair game and your kids are fair game, certainly Obama's past should be. I mean, we want to treat men and women equally, right?

"Hey, you know, that's a great point,'' Palin said. "In that weird conspiracy theory freaky thing that people talk about, that Trig isn't my real son, a lot of people that, 'Well, you need to produce his birth certificate, you need to prove that he's your kid,' which we have done, but yeah, so maybe we should reverse that and use the same type of thinking on the other one.''

After Salon.com pointed out Palin's words on the Obama birth certificate question, the governor made this early morning entry on her famous Facebook page, now nearing 1.1 million in followers.

"Voters have every right to ask candidates for information if they so choose. I've pointed out that it was seemingly fair game during the 2008 election for many on the left to badger my doctor and lawyer for proof that Trig is in fact my child. Conspiracy-minded reporters and voters had a right to ask... which they have repeatedly.

"But at no pointnot during the campaign, and not during recent interviewshave I asked the president to produce his birth certificate or suggested that he was not born in the United States.

- Sarah Palin

"I'm so thankful for Facebook,'' Palin told the radio host also. "I don't have to go through the mainstream media... spinning my words.''

"We love you,'' Humphries told Palin.


Georgia House Speaker Quits Amid Personal Turmoil

Glenn Richardson, the first Republican to become speaker since Reconstruction, resigned Thursday after a suicide attempt and allegations by his ex-wife that he carried on an affair with a lobbyist.


Kamis, 03 Desember 2009

Officers Suspended in Wake of WH Crashing
The Secret Service Takes the Blame for Allowing Unauthorized Guests into the White House State Dinner
'Obama brand:' Rogers, social CEO

by Mark Silva

Desiree Rogers came to Washington touting "the Obama brand.''

Now it's Rogers' brand of social management that some are questioning, with the White House Social Secretary at the center of congressional subpoena talk that in past times has been reserved for the likes of political architects such as Karl Rove.

Desiree Rogers at luau.jpg

Rogers always has been known for getting things just right, our friends at Bloomberg News note: "Her condominium in Chicago's upscale Gold Coast neighborhood was filled with Valerie Jarrett's favorite foods and flowers when she threw a birthday party for the incoming senior presidential adviser 10 days after Barack Obama's election,'' John McCormick and Kate Andersen Brower write.

So it's little wonder that Jarrett, a senior adviser to the president and close friend of Rogers, was standing up for her outside the White House today.

Yet, McCormick and colleague note, "in the first state dinner Rogers hosted as a White House social secretary, it is two Virginia residents accused of party crashing most remembered, instead of the arugula salad with onionseed vinaigrette or the pumpkin pie tart.

"This is not the story they hoped would endure after the state dinner," Dee Dee Myers, who served as press secretary to President Bill Clinton says. {It's not the kind of thing you expect to happen, "But in some ways you should anticipate potential problems like this."

The failure of Rogers's office to prevent the security breach of Tareq and Michaele Salahi making their way into the State Dinner held for Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh became a focus of questioning at the Homeland Security Committee today. The Secret Service Director, Mark Sullivan, accepted full blame for the breach.

Now leading members of the committee want to subpoena Rogers and aren't impressed with the White House's resistance: "I could accept their argument if this was any policy, but this is involves an administrative act by an appointee of the president,'' Rep. Peter King of New York, ranking Republican on the committee, said today.

"There's a pretty long history of ensuring White House staff can provide advice to the president and do so confidentially," Robert Gibbs, W.H. press secretary, said of the privilege that the White House is citing. -- a privilege, he noted, that has been forfeited for matters as grave as Watergate, Whitewater and 9/11, but not for a social receiving line. "I don't think even Peter King would have the audacity'' to put this case in that "trifecta.''

So it hasn't taken long for the Obama White House to be fending off congressional subpoena talk -- the stuff that the investigation of the Bush White House's firing of U.S. attorneys was made of -- over a not-so-simple dinner.

The Washington Post already has raised the Rogers question most pointedly, in a piece penned by the very reporter who was asking Rogers about the gown that she was wearing at the dinner. "Are you wearing Comme Des Garcons?" the Post asked.

"Of course," Rogers replied.

More attention to stitches than guests?

"Back when the president's polling numbers were higher, Rogers, who is known for her love of designer dresses and jazz, told the Wall Street Journal's magazine that the White House was filled with marketing possibilities,'' the Bloomberg team writes. She bragged: "We have the best brand on Earth: the Obama brand.''

Now it's the Rogers brand of management that's in question. Rogers declined to comment through a spokeswoman for First Lady Michelle Obama. But a longtime friend in Chicago, Mellody Hobson, president of Ariel Investments, suggested that the criticism "isn't fair.. I have never seen her be sloppy, ever."

Kathleen Hennessey and Christi Parsons contributed.

(Just right: Rogers is pictured above at a luau held for members of Congress and their families on the South Lawn of the White House June 25, in a celebration of the president's home state, The South Lawn was decorated with tiki torches and palm huts and the meal prepared by Hawaiian chef Alan Wong. Photo by Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images.)


With Eye On Second Term, Bernanke Defends Record

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke got tough questioning from the Senate Banking Committee on the failures of the Fed leading up to the financial crisis and on the role in played in the bailout of Wall Street firms. While Bernanke is ultimately expected to be reconfirmed, the hearing may influence the Fed's future role in an overhauled financial system.


Rabu, 02 Desember 2009

Obama Aides Sell Afghan Plan to Congress
Pentagon Chief Robert Gates Warns of "Severe Consequences" of Failure; Clinton Says Plan is "Best Way to Protect Our Nation"
Gibbs: 'War with the Def-Sec you have'

by Mark Silva

It was Donald Rumsfeld, the former Secretary of Defense, who once told soldiers asking for more equipment: "You go to war with the Army you have.''

Rumsfeld on way out.jpg

And it is Rumsfeld, who oversaw the Bush administration's invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, who now is chafing at President Barack Obama's contention that the Bush administration rebuffed commanders' repeated requests for more troops in Afghanistan.

"Such a bald misstatement, at least as it pertains to the period I served as secretary of defense, deserves a response," Rumsfeld said in a written statement today. "I am not aware of a single request of that nature between 2001 and 2006."

The Obama White House, for its part, is content to let Rumsfeld answer the question about whether the Bush administration adequately supported a war that now has exceeded eight years -- with Obama now ordering an additonal 30,000 troops, raising the deployment in Afghanistan to 98,000 by next summer.

The Bush administration had deployed about 32,000 to Afghanistan before Obama arrived at the White House.

"When I took office, we had just over 32,000 Americans serving in Afghanistan, compared to 160,000 in Iraq at the peak of the war,'' Obama said last night, in his nationally televised address from West Point announcing a troop surge -- and a date for the start of troop withdrawals, in July 2011. "Commanders in Afghanistan repeatedly asked for support to deal with the reemergence of the Taliban, but these reinforcements did not arrive. ''

Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, was not biting on Rumsfeld's objections today in the daily press briefing.

"You go to war with the Secretary of Defense that you have,'' Gibbs said.

(The Obama White House also has the Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, whom the Bush White House had at the end of its run -- and there was talk of boosting troops, after Rumsfeld left the Pentagon. Read on:)

(Former President George W. Bush, is pictured with outgoing Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in November 2006, above, after the GOP's "thumping'' in the midterm elections. Bush's first secretary was replaced by former CIA Director Robert Gates, who stayed on with the Obama administration. Photo by Gerald Herbert / )

I In April 2008, two months before assuming command, Gen. David McKiernan traveled to Afghanistan and concluded that there were not enough troops to counter the Taliban.

"There was a saying when I got there: If you're in Iraq and you need something, you ask for it," McKiernan said in an interview after being fired. "If you're in Afghanistan and you need it, you figure out how to do without it."

By late last summer, he decided to tell Bush's White House what he knew it did not want to hear: He needed 30,000 more troops.

The Bush administration did not act on McKiernan's request, instead attempting to convince NATO allies to contribute more troops.


New York Lawmakers Reject Gay Marriage Bill

The Senate decision Wednesday comes after months of delays and arm twisting of lawmakers sympathetic to the bill but representing conservative districts. It follows a referendum in Maine earlier this month that struck down a gay marriage law before it took effect.


Selasa, 01 Desember 2009

Obama: Afghan surge, then draw-down

Gay Marriage in D.C. Passes First Test
City Council Passes Bill 11-2 in First of Two Votes this Month
Families of Immigrants Send Money to U.S. to Help During Financial Crisis
ABC’s Marc Frank reports from Havana: Hundreds of Cubans still line up at the U.S. Interests Section in Havana each week in hopes of obtaining a visa to visit relatives, or to do the paperwork after receiving one of the...
Obama: Afghan surge, then draw-down

by Christi Parsons and Julian E. Barnes, updated 4 pm EST

WEST POINT, N.Y. -- President Obama has ordered the deployment of 30,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan, officials said today, yet the president also will announce tonight that the U.S. will start withdrawing forces from the country in July of 2011.

The reinforcements will be sent to Afghanistan by next summer, senior administration officials said todaywith 30,000 new troops boosting an existing U.S. deployment of 68,000 troops in the country.

The president will announce his decision in a nationally televised speech at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. The speech, officials said, will focus not only on the new troops entering the country, but also on the administration's plan to withdraw those forces.

The administration will begin to withdraw the reinforcements by July 2011, senior administration officials said. The pace of that draw-down and the ending point of it will be determined by "conditions on the ground" that cannot be currently predicted, one official said.

"This is not an open-ended commitment ... all of us have to have a sense of urgency," said one senior administration official said.

"Starting in July 2011, we will begin to transfer authority to Afghan forces," an administration official said, "but the rate at which we draw down the troops has not been prescribed." That rate will be "conditions-based," the official said, "with an eye towards full transfer as quickly as possible."

The administration was emphasizing that it is not sending combat forces to the war zone indefinitely, but wants to show a long-term commitment of broader support to Afghanistan.

The goal of the troop build-up is to "degrade" Taliban forces in Afghanistan, prevent the Taliban from taking over the nation and also prevent al Qaeda from returning to Afghanistan, allowing time for the Afghan security forces to become more competent, officials said.

During a prolonged strategy review, the military proposed sending in additional forces over the course of a year. But officials said that the course which the president has chosen will deliver more troops to Afghanistan more swiftly.

"The force option that the president has chosen gets more troops into Afghanistan faster than any other option that was presented to him,'' one senior administration official said.

The decision came at the end of a three-month review of the new strategy for an 8-year-old war.

Although conducted behind closed doors in the White House's Situation Room, parts of the debate played out in an unusually public manner, with officials briefing reporters on the outlines of the debate.

Vice President Joe Biden and Karl Eikenberry, the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, were skeptical about the troop buildup. During the debate, Biden made the case that the focus should be on Pakistan and advocated sending fewer troops to Afghanistan and instead using unmanned drones and other air strikes to disrupt Taliban operations in more rural areas.

But senior military leaders, including Adm. Michael G. Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, pushed for a higher number of troops.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates helped work out a compromise that brought McChrystal's request for 40,000 troops down by 10,000.

Today, an administration official said that all of the officials involved in the discussions had signed on to the final compromise. There were no "winners and losers in this debate," the official said.
Gates is due to sign deployment orders for the troops going into Afghanistan later this week. The troops will be sent to Khost in eastern Afghanistan as well as to Kandahar and Helmand provinces in southern Afghanistan.
The forces pouring into eastern and southern Afghanistan will seek to undermine the Taliban in part by luring low-level fighters and foot soldiers to abandon extremist movements.

The administration plan envisions trying to shift the loyalty of low-level fighters to tribal leaders by offering them jobs in security forces. That strategy borrows from the military strategy in Iraq, where insurgents were given paid jobs in neighborhood defense forces.

A military official that the focus on flipping low-level fighters was an important "component of where we are headed."

In meetings during the strategy review, senior military officials insisted that, because improved security was a precondition for "flipping" foot soldiers and fence sitters, adding forces was necessary for such initiatives to work.
"What you are talking about are the fence sitters, the ones who support the Taliban not by choice but by fear," said the military official. "You want to supplant that fear with security."

The senior officials said the new deployment will include two or three combat brigades. In addition a "brigade-sized element"--about 3,500 forces--will be sent as trainers. But the senior administration official emphasized that all of the forces would be partnered with Afghan security forces to assist with training.

Although Obama's speech will focus mostly on Afghanistan, officials said the review also looked at Pakistan and emphasized the importance of assisting Pakistan with security and economic issues.

"We need to help the Pakistanis stabilize their state," said one senior administration official.

Military experts have cautioned that setting a concrete timetable to leave Afghanistan could enable the Taliban to outlast the U.S. combat forces. But the military officials said the Taliban would minimize the U.S. commitment to Afghanistan at "its own risk."

Peter Nicholas and Mark Silva contributed from Washington.


Obama To Outline Afghan Strategy

President Obama announces Tuesday that he is sending 30,000 new troops to Afghanistan over the next six months, administration sources say. At a speech from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., Obama is expected to also discuss how long he thinks the U.S. mission will last.